Leadership Skills for a Globalized World

by Brandi Moore on April 25, 2012

200 million people.

That’s the number of people that joined the global workforce for the first time in the past decade. Information technology has invited workers, living in regions that never before had access to global opportunities, into organizations across the world. These workers offer a great promise never before seen by organizations: highly trained talent at low cost prices.

This is an exciting development. But it comes with the challenge of understanding how to build global managers that can deftly lead teams with very different business culture values to produce the results organizations’ desire.

This is not easy, but it could be. The first step is noticing this change – the integration of new workers from remote lands with divergent, and at times conflicting, values to the Western worker. The next step is to plan for it by training leaders to skillfully understand and lead initiatives to success. At IndiaThink℠ we call these employees Global Managers.

For all of these global interconnections to work, leaders that build commitment, manage uncertainty and communicate business needs across cultures are a necessity. These skills go beyond being interculturally sensitive, or knowing that business cultures are different and understanding a few parameters about differences such as the “Indian Yes.” Global Managers focus on the dynamic of business interactions. They emulate local leadership from afar and can detect problems early, make necessary plans to tackle them, and move to resolution.

At IndiaThink we develop global leaders through our training and coaching programs. After working with us, our clients understand how business culture impacts everything in an international relationship. This may seem hard to imagine, but it is absolutely true. Every challenge in a relationship can be mapped back to a culture difference.

How do I, as the Founder of IndiaThink℠, think about business culture in today’s environment? This article offers, some of the insights I share with my clients about how business culture interactions create challenges. It’s likely that what you read here will be a first, but it will change the way you see what is happening in your global relationships. I look forward to hearing from you personally –send me an email with your comments.

The Organizational Culture: Expectations and Experience.
Every organization has an internal culture and set of values outlining what is expected. Employees don’t talk a lot about these values because they are understood. To be successful, employees adhere to the culture that surrounds them and typically it takes just a few weeks for a new employee to understand “how things work around here.”

These rules thread through interactions in the lunchroom, where you may engage in friendly banter with those that report to you, to discourse during meetings, to how you treat your boss when you see him outside the office. Everything done at work is guided by these actions, which quickly become subconscious. Without this map, every choice would be overwhelming at best – it would take hours to decide how to engage as each new email, conversation and meeting presented itself throughout the day.

These values form a strong subconscious inside organizations and instruct us what to assume will happen. This works great when interacting with local colleagues, who drink the same cool-aid if you will, but it leads to failure when reaching outside the organization for additional resources because outsiders don’t share these values. Further, and perhaps more damaging, they know nothing about them.

These same values become expectations inside global partnerships. The challenge is what is expected in the West is very different from what is expected in other nations. It would be fair, and actually safer from a business perspective, to assume what is expected in the West is different from the rest of the world.

When I talk about the differences between the BRIC cultures – Brazil, Russia, India and China – and the West, I tell Western leaders to assume the BRIC does business 100% differently than they will expect.

These expectations inside an organization, combined with little insight into what foreign teams may find completely acceptable, create dramatic problems and cost a tremendous amount of money and time if employees don’t possess the right leadership skills.

For example, in Western firms, employees are often expected to bring their perspective to work by asking questions, pointing out challenges, and offering solutions. Consensus is highly valued and seen as a leadership skill. Employees are graded on contributing these insights – did they help to move the organization forward? In technology organizations, these skills are in hyper drive because time is of the essence.

This type of culture creates a safe place to report problems. The mantra is “if you see something, say something.” Almost every Western manager will claim that there is never harm in reporting a problem. It’s very rare that employees do not report problems they identify. Further, employees will almost always try to solve problems first and then report how they fixed what they found.

In the BRIC, these values are not inherent in a typical organization. While the pursuit for identifying problems may exist, the business culture preference is for employees to hint at problems in the hopes that management notices. There will be times when management will miss the hint leaving the problem unaccounted for.

And here is where the problems begin: The Western team assumes problems will be reported, discussed and solved. The BRIC teams wait for leadership to notice problems and manage them.

While this may seem subtle, there is a gold mine of problems behind this difference: surprisingly late projects, products delivered in the wrong code, incorrect budget estimates, promises that the new features will be completed, or new staff incorrectly trained on the initiative.

The truth is that both sides of the partnership are acting with the best of aims, but no one is taking the role of global leadership to decode the situation.

Why not?

The Case for Training Employees Leadership Skills for Globalized World

It is a myth that individuals are born with the capability to be globally savvy. This myth is passed around at cocktail parties today because it’s easy to believe the globalization has erased business culture differences.

Actually, the exact opposite has happened and this is critical to understand.

The recession of 2008 verified that Western business methods are not the only ones that bring success. It silenced rhetoric that capitalism is THE alternative, that Western business schools have all the answers, and that expatriate leadership is the solution to every emerging market company’s challenge.

The recession experienced in the West was barely felt in other parts of the world giving new power to the business preferences held for centuries in places like China and India.

As Europe and the US fell into financial chaos, the BRIC, powered by what is an almost opposite business culture, zoomed ahead. This called to question: Is the Western way really the best?

This new paradigm, combined with the reality that all of these global interactions are relatively new and growing more intense every day, has left a vacuum of leadership because most firms assume employees will just “figure it out.”

This is a prescription for failure.

Firms that take this path spend too much money finding new providers, re-doing projects, missing market windows and hiring advisors to solve problems.

Just 10-15 years ago being assigned to work with a foreign team required extensive training. Individuals were singled out to travel to these lands and act as corporate diplomats. Today, there is a different – and damaging mantra. Western firms often presume that all employees are perfectly poised to effectively manage teams in China even though they have never traveled there and have little understanding of even the basic concepts of the Chinese business culture.

This leaves them trying to decode what is happening without really understanding what to look for because he or she can’t Identify the problem until it’s the product is 2 months late and a market window is missed.

But here is the good news…..Here is the truth: Every organization has a solution right in front of them: their own employees. Once these employees understand why someone is acting in particular ways – once they learn how to detect the dynamics of business cultures – they guide global transformation for organizations.

Recognize…… and Act

We are experiencing, for the first time, an intense worldwide effort to engage across business cultures. The old multi-national firm, while it still exists, is no longer the only player in global markets. Technology allows everyone to engage from anywhere in the world.

Ten years ago the amount of connection and access allowed today was theory. Facebook, Twitter, extremely savvy smartphones and cloud services have all dramatically changed our world. We had no idea this change was going to happen. Our lack of predictive abilities has left our workforce ill prepared for the magnitude of global interactions required for real business transformation.

The way to harness this opportunity – to really live the full vision and promise of globalization and is opportunities –is to build a team of leaders with the right skills that can deliver for your organization. Without these leaders, global transformation is only a dream.

Copyright IndiaThink Corporation

—–BIO —–
Brandi Moore is the Founder of IndiaThink℠ and the author of The Little BRIC Book: Cracking the code to global management of projects in Brazil, Russia, India and China. Her work has been featured in The Wall Street Journal, Forbes.com, Christian Science Monitor, PBS Rising Voices, and Outsource Magazine. For more information about IndiaThink visit indiathink.com. To learn more about The Global Manager Program visit theglobalmanager.com. Brandi can be reached at brandi@indiathink.com

You may also like:

{ 0 comments }

“Over a thousand Americans are working today because we stopped a surge in Chinese tires.” President Barack Obama, State of the Union Address, Jan 2012

In 2009, the US government, with the support of Obama, enacted a tariff on Chinese tires with a goal of supporting the US market and creating more jobs. The effect? Most sources agree that very few, if any jobs were created. What did happen? American corporations moved supply chains to different countries, mainly Mexico, Indonesia and Thailand.

US Corporations operate in a system that is barely, if at all, controlled by the US government. Control is an illusion. Politicians want you to believe things are “under their control”, but if you listen closely to what they say and what they DO you will see through this charade.

Corporations have US government leaders up against the wall because at any moment they can decide to leave – and will – if conditions become untenable. This is perhaps the first tenant of globalization that everyone should understand. There is no longer need for loyalty to a land/nation/state. Instead there is loyalty to shareholders, productivity, and product generation. Globalization has opened the door for this to happen anywhere. We have not seen a large corporation take advantage of this yet – however we do see the start of this process and its struggle. A good example is General Electric not paying any taxes in 2011. This caused a minor riot, but nothing changed. US leaders know they want GE to stay in the US.

Globalization provides unlimited options for corporations. Its nearly impossible to control where corporations choose to hire staff and make their products. The tire tariff is a good example of this perceived control. By placing a tariff on one nation, unless that nation is the only place on earth that makes that product at that moment, corporations will end run the system because its EASY to do so. Its not hard to decide to make tires in Thailand instead of China when you already have a globalized manufacturing framework that is designed to serve world markets.

To believe that a tariff will change behavior is avoiding the real conversation, the one politicians are unwilling to have. It’s talking about where the US is failing. Things like manufacturing capability at home vs. overseas, lack of educated talent in particular areas such as information technology which has a 3% unemployment rate, to name a few areas.

But, this is a conversation politicians don’t like having because it focuses on responsibility and increases the perception that someone CAN and SHOULD be doing something. It and places the power of assessment in the open. It takes away the scare factor of “Evil China” and puts it back on “what are you doing, Obama, to change this” or “what will YOU do Mitt Romney to change this?” Neither have an answer, but this doesn’t mean that one does not exist.

It’s a new conversation, in public at least, one where politicians would have to admit their ultimate opponent: Globalization combined with Capitalism. In this new configuration, where the world has flipped to corporations being much more powerful than governments, strategies that look great on paper FAIL.

This is where the second tenant of globalization is really important:Globalization is really, really complicated. Using China as the bad guy is quite brillant because it fits into sound bits. Talking about the reality of what actions mean is much harder if not impossible. “How do I talk to my kid about Globalization?” is answered with “I don’t know” because its hard.

For example: Should the  American consumer buy a tire made by Michelin in Thailand? 

This is the real complexity of globalization. The American consumer likes a good deal, goes to the local tire shop and unbeknownst to him, purchases tires from Thailand that are sold under an American brand like Michelin.The tire may or may not be labeled as being made there.

The consumer trusts the brand. And as judged by independent groups, he should. The product is the “same” where ever Michelin makes it as judged by independent groups such as Tire Review.

But the system has become so complicated with so many layers that it’s impossible for the average human to absorb the impact of their choice. Its clear to some Americans that purchasing from a Chinese Brand is different than purchasing from Michelin. But what about purchasing tires made in Thailand from Michellin? Every decision would be a major research project, taxing the American consumer into idleness.

This election season I predict we will see more of the same – demonizing China and ignoring the bigger questions. America needs real leaders who are willing to answer these questions.

 

You may also like:

{ 2 comments }

Market to Manufacture to MANAGE: The rapid change caused by globalization

October 26, 2011
Thumbnail image for Market to Manufacture to MANAGE: The rapid change caused by globalization

One of the challenges we face as Global Managers is the accelerated pace that cross-cultural relationships have experienced in the past past 15 years. Very quickly the need for cross-cultural management skills went from expatriates to executives based at home to leaders at almost every level of the organization. How did this happen? One way [...]

Read the full article →

Innovation in the BRIC: Innovating into Growth vs Replacement

October 20, 2011

Should your company use an Avon or McDonald’s strategy in the BRIC? Jack Rivkin, a friend of mine recently said; “innovating into growth is a lot easier than innovating into replacement.” This statement seems really obvious, but I don’t think most American organizations have wrapped their BRIC strategies around this concept. Another way of saying this is [...]

Read the full article →

Nobel Prize winner Thomas Sargent’s tip on innovation

October 13, 2011

Just a few days ago Thomas Sargent was one of the winners of the Nobel Prize for economics. What made this years choice so POWERFUL was the selection of someone who has offered many, many insights to the business community that have already been proven to be true and extremely valuable. Sargent put forward the [...]

Read the full article →

Innovation in the BRIC: Generating Ideas

October 12, 2011

  It’s a well known truth that without innovation organizations fail to more forward and compete. Most multi-national organizations hope for innovation in their BRIC based locations that allows them to conquer local markets. When searching for Innovation, the focus of this month’s blog posts, the underlying culture of the country combined with organization’s culture [...]

Read the full article →

Secret agreements on culture

September 11, 2011

The recent report by Softtek and Horses for Sources, ‘How Latin America Powers Global IT Delivery’, is a painful example of how the community of outsourcing talks about culture. The report implies that business culture is equivalent to seeing Western products, using a credit card, or viewing shows on television. In speaking with Beni Lopez [...]

Read the full article →

Do You Have To Be Corrupt To Compete In The BRIC?

July 26, 2011

The Times of India reported last month that Cisco may be investigated by India’s Central Bureau of Investigation as part of the growing corruption scandal around technology purchases made to support India’s Common Wealth Games. Cisco’s products and services are 80% of the deal being focused on, which was sold through MTLN (Mahaganar Telephone Nigam [...]

Read the full article →

Outsourcing the law to India

June 15, 2011

Memo to this year’s graduating law students: Your first job is already gone — to India. The law firms of America, and their clients, have quietly decided that the work a first-year associate typically performs — such as document review, research and contract drafting — can be done more cheaply. And the cheaper team lives [...]

Read the full article →

American Business Needs To Shed Its Paper Tiger Reputation

May 31, 2011

A defining factor of a paper tiger is its lack of bite. In the business world, this translates to a deficit of strong, long-lasting relationships with business partners. While businesses across cultures and countries are building successful ventures with these type of relationships, particularly in the BRIC countries, Americans at a disadvantage by not mixing [...]

Read the full article →